Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Miller (musician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy Delete (A7) by admin user:Causa sui. (non-admin closure) Whpq (talk) 19:34, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Jeremy Miller (musician)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I originally BLP-prodded this as the only sources listed are from Twitter, which I think hardly counts as a reliable source. This has been contested however. Rather than argue the point, I thought it best just to come here. While I find hits at places such as MySpace and ReverbNation, I am not seeing significant coverage from secondary sources. Lady of  Shalott  20:19, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —  Lady  of  Shalott  20:21, 18 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Jeremy is signed with Island Records and should be releasing music shortly. The label have, to date, kept the project under wraps but have now gone public, hence why there is currently a shortage of references to cite from. Whilst we are impressed with the speed in which this article was noticed, we would appreciate a few days in which to gather appropriate references.Union jak86 (talk) 20:40, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete until after he's put out something. Until after the media gets attention of him. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:52, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete he's not notable yet. Eeekster (talk) 20:55, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I searched a database of newspaper and magazine articles, but was not able to find anything about this musician. He also does not seem to have an Allmusic bio . For now, there does not appear to be evidence of WP:N notability, nor WP:MUSICBIO, so I recommend delete. I would be glad to revisit that recommendation should anyone turn up some reliable third-party sources. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 23:48, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, zero indication of any notability, possibly even a speedy A7 since I see no claim of importance in the article. -- Kinu  t/c 16:53, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.