Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Mora

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Tony Sidaway Talk 11:14, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

Jeremy Mora
How vain. Erwin Walsh *Keep Over 130,000 results on Google. How can someone be too young to be notable? Lindsay Lohan is 19, and she got her own page. Jeremy Mora is five years her senior. Acetic Acid 17:46, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Too young to be notable, no major shows in notable galleries. Erwin, I recommend you try to be more polite in your nominations. Sdedeo 16:38, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. Hi Acetic Acid, you may want to regoogle and reconsider your vote. I find "Jeremy Mora" (in quotes) gets 47 google hits, very few of which actually refer to the man in question. Sdedeo 18:02, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment the link you provided gives 72 hits on google...
 * Delete Thank you for bringing that to my attention. I never realized putting it in quotes keep the words together. Sorry for this. Acetic Acid 21:36, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity. Maybe Userfy to user:Qthinker if he wants to contribute to the project. Dunc|&#9786; 17:53, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment from the Wikipedia Vanity page: "As explained below, vanity by itself is not a basis for deletion" and also, from 'Wikipedia:Criteria for inclusion of biographies' - "Painters, sculptors, architects, engineers, and other professionals whose work is recognized as exceptional and likely to become a part of the enduring historical record of that field." Qthinker
 * You well explained why he doesn't make the cut. 213.78.124.163 19:29, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Not exactly sure how you made that conclusion based on what i just provided. Anyone else??? Qthinker
 * Delete Always use quotes on a google search. As above, I also get 73 results, making this a nn, possibly vanity page. Dottore So 19:25, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete insufficiently notable. His portfolio looks reasonable, so he might make it, but it is interesting to contrast with Tom Friedman (artist) who was also edited by a related anon. Friedman is also unknown to me, but his article shows that he has exhibited internationally and the Bienale link gives external validation. -- Solipsist 20:28, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I've got a slight advantage given that I work in the arts, but I have heard of Friedman and he is moderately well known. Mora? Maybe one day, but not now (delete). Grutness...  wha?  09:49, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.