Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Page (poet)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's subject is found to lack the notability required for inclusion in this encyclopedia. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 03:40, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Jeremy Page (poet)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article appears to be a CV of a poet who has had some work published and has founded his own small circulation magazine. Apart from the poetrykit.org website the article is cited entirely to primary sources. Apart from this local news article I can't find any independent, reliable coverage about him or his work (it's not helped by there being a more noteworthy novelist with the same name). If an artist had some paintings exhibited it wouldn't confer notability on them, so I don't see how this guy meets WP:GNG, WP:CREATIVE or WP:PROF based on publishing some poems. Time for it to go? Sionk (talk) 20:20, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I confirm findings. A deep  search has only revealed that he has an unfortunately common name. In spite of that difficulty there are no reviews of his published works and I could only find one "peer-reviewed" publication to justify WP:PROF. I don't quite understand how you peer-review a poem. Actually, after just reading it, that poem is pretty profound. But my opinion is moot. &mdash;አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 22:48, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:18, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:18, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:18, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:18, 5 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete this was a massively pufffed-up article before I removed the twice-listed list of works, the list of poeple he has read his poetry with and the entirely promotional external links section. Now that that is done, there seem to be two sources left. Neither are convincing, and a cursory search turns up little more. does not meet GNG.96.127.243.41 (talk) 17:49, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - He does not seem to meet the notability criteria for WP:GNG.  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:00, 11 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.