Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Pugh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Over whelming keep consensus. WP:SNOW keep close. (non-admin closure) AmericanAir88(talk) 15:03, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Jeremy Pugh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lack of significance through coverage which may not meet WP:RUGBY and WP:BLP. Sheldybett (talk) 10:30, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:02, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:03, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:09, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Keep — Is this nomination someone’s idea of a joke? Pugh played several international rugby matches for a Tier 1 rugby nation, so he satisfies WP:NRU. And the article contains several citations to reliable sources, which satisfies WP:GNG. CUA 27 (talk) 12:31, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Has played international Rugby, clearly passes WP:NSPORT! Govvy (talk) 13:45, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep, as creator. He meets point 1 of WP:NRU (though I agree that bit of notability guidance is slightly confusing) because he played for his senior national team. Sionk (talk) 21:08, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep clearly meets notability criteria. Open and shut case.Skeene88 (talk) 18:05, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per everyone above. I was very tempted to just WP:SNOW close this rather than express an opinion it's that clear. Thryduulf (talk) 18:11, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.