Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Schultz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 07:35, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Jeremy Schultz

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Apparently non-notable graphic designer. Being an editor, or even a "founding member", of even a recognized journal is not notable, IMHO. Even if I'm wrong there, we have no sources for the journal being notable. &mdash; Arthur Rubin | (talk) 17:14, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * (Previous PROD restored, as the recreation appears to also contain an appeal of that deletion, which should be automatically restored.) &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 19:46, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete on the basis of being unable to find secondary sources for either artist or journal. -- Sesame ball Talk 18:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions.   —David Eppstein 02:46, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Clubmarx 16:43, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I am attempting to restore an old entry that someone wrote on me some time ago. I assume it was notable then because it was not challenged or deleted outright, and I have tried to write in the spirit of the original entry. The question of what constitutes "notability" and whether I am "notable" is highly debatable, but I do know that the magazines and periodicals I've been included in are important to the design industry and Designorati.com is fairly well-known as well. Would it help if I cited a few sources where Designorati.com has been listed and mentioned by other (notable, I assume) designers, design pubs and blogs? Jeremyschultz 16:43, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Doesn't meet WP:BIO. Johnbod 03:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.