Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Stahl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:40, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Jeremy Stahl

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While it appears that Stahl has written a lot of articles, it doesn't seem like anyone else has written about him. Writing articles is simply what journalists do, notability requires more. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:49, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - My searches (News, Books, highbeam and thefreelibrary) found nothing significant aside from a few mentions at Books. With no target for moving, delete for now until notability is established. SwisterTwister   talk  06:03, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: It's very possible that my view is distorted, because I read progressive blogs and left wing stuff, but I rather think that Stahl is getting discussed in journalism. I don't know if those are all passim or what it would take -- how many "Power Panel" appearances and the like -- but he's certainly parlayed the Slate position into further discussion. Hithladaeus (talk) 12:10, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:39, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - run-of-the-mill journalist, no indication in the article why he should be notable, no independent sources, no coverage, web searches turn up his artcles and blog posts Kraxler (talk) 00:50, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete User:Hithladaeus may be correct, he may be creating buzz, searches do find his name on some non-notable blogs, so, it may simply be WP:TOOSOON.  However, he does not pass the GNG test of reliable, third-party sources.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:36, 18 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.