Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerkmate




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BD2412 T 04:55, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Jerkmate

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NORG / WP:CORPDEPTH. Please note that most of the cited sources are NSFW. They are:
 * 1. A very promotional review on "girlcamsites.com". This seems like an unreliable source.
 * 2. An award roster for a non-notable award. Pornography industry awards are a dime a dozen.
 * 3. A press release (credited as "newswire") promoting the company's affiliate marketing program.
 * 4. Another ad for the affiliate program. Notice that the url is
 * 5. This is an ad that ran in The Austin Chronicle, not a regular news article. Just look at the other entries in https://www.austinchronicle.com/daily/ads/ (NSFW) -- it's full of ads for snake oil and scams.
 * 6. An affiliate marketing article. If readers click through to the advertised websites and spend money there, the article publisher will receive a cut of the proceeds.
 * 7, 8, 9. Promotional articles about the affiliate marketing program in the pornography trade press. The AVN and YNOT articles are lightly edited copies of the same press release cited as Ref 4. gnu 57 18:47, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Sexuality and gender,  and Websites. gnu 57  18:47, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment it's hard to find anything discussing them that isn't, um, adult-related. We'd really have to dig to find a decent mention of the site in RS. Nothing in the NYT or other news sites. Oaktree b (talk) 23:32, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 15 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete: does not meet NORG / WP:ORGDEPTH. --K.e.coffman (talk) 19:38, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not finding non-trivial independent RS coverage to satisfy WP:WEBCRIT, never mind clearing the higher bar of WP:CORPDEPTH. Incidental mentions and plenty of sponsored content. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. I am unable to find WP:ORGDEPTH-level coverage of this organization from multiple independent reliable sources, so this fails WP:NCORP and should be deleted per WP:DEL-REASON#8. —  Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:01, 21 September 2022 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.