Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jermaine Reed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Kansas City, Missouri City Council . Thanks everyone for participating. :) Please assume good faith with my decision. If you believe this article was deleted without good reason, please request undeletion at deletion request, not my talk page. Thank you. SarahStierch (talk) 03:50, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Jermaine Reed

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Very detailed, but none of it is notable by any reasonable standard. If the GNG alone is enough to justify this, then  we need to re-examine the rationale.  DGG ( talk ) 04:29, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Sure, delete it. DocumentError (talk) 06:38, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. All the sources are local, as one might expect in a case such as this.  I would probably be more conflicted about this article if it hadn't been an autobiography. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Becoming an elected official is not in itself notable. Unless the subject has used that office to actually achieve something that somebody in that position might not reasonably be expected to achieve, then this article is not about anyone notable. --gilgongo (talk) 00:33, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually, it is for many positions. We write articles for people before they're even sworn into office, when they've literally accomplished nothing notable besides winning an election. US Representatives, state legislators, and city councilmembers for cities about twice as large as Kansas City are all presumed to be notable. -LtNOWIS (talk) 20:50, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 01:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 01:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Kansas City, Missouri City Council to preserve the search term. -LtNOWIS (talk) 20:50, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.