Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeroen Recourt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JohnCD (talk) 19:16, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Jeroen Recourt

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Give more sources. —AssassiN's Creed (talk) 19:04, 10 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Added. Wikix (talk) 19:08, 10 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Article is well-referenced for it's since and subject easily meets notability guidelines as a member of the Dutch Parliment. Edward321 (talk) 19:12, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 10 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Adequately sourced and passes WP:POLITICIAN as a member of parliament. Question to nominator: why was this article taken to AfD less than 90 minutes after it was created ? • Gene93k (talk) 20:45, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Gene93k. And WP:BEFORE surely applies. AllyD (talk) 21:10, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Members of a national legislature are always held to be notable. AfD is not the place to list articles that need sourcing. It is for listing articles you think should be deleted because they are not notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.