Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeroni Nadal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:34, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Jeroni Nadal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article on non notable physician. Does not meet WP:PROF-- his most cited paper has only 21 citations, which is trivial in this subject. The article on his clinic has already beendeletedas advertising. Some of the references here are in major papers, but they aren one the less press releases, it's interesting that they contain the same professional image as used here. Lack of notability is not the only reason for deletion. Borderline notability combined with clear promotionalism is an equally good reason. Once we become a vehicle for promotion, we're useless as an encyclopedia  DGG ( talk ) 01:25, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as not at all convincing for the applicable notability, nothing else convincing and there's simply nothing else to salvage including Draft which I would not at all encourage. SwisterTwister   talk  03:12, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  03:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  03:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  03:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete yet another non-notable physician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:58, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability. No sign of significant coverage in reliable sources.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  10:34, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.