Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerry Agar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 22:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Jerry Agar

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

There are no reliable sources talking about this person in any significant depth. Bolt and Thunder (talk) 17:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:13, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Radio, Politics,  and Canada. Bolt and Thunder (talk) 17:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  17:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Illinois, Missouri,  and New York.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:09, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep The National Post reference, already in the article, is detailed and significant. I've fixed the link, but it should have popped in a Proquest search. There is a LOT of mentions of him as a key player during Mayor Rob Ford's drug and sex scandals, as Ford would appear repeatedly, often exclusively, and sometimes even sober, on Agar's show. Also in the Tuggs scandal, as reported nationally in the Globe and Mail. Nfitz (talk) 19:21, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: I know of him, but can't find much of anything about him. is confirmation of his radio show. He's been sued for defamation a few times, but that doesn't make him notable here.  Oaktree b (talk) 20:26, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per Nfitz' refs. As to Oaktree b's comment about defamation suits: I think they belong here if, but only if, he lost a suit, had to retract his comments or to apologize. This is because any valid defamation accusations speak to his reliability as a broadcaster, a salient issue in his field. -- A. B. (talk • contribs •  global count)  17:52, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.