Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerry Booth (technologist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete -- JForget 01:18, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Jerry Booth (technologist)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Autobiography. Unsourced. There is some claim to notability, but any article should be created by someone without a conflict of interest. Delete. gadfium 02:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NN. Possible Speedy Delete for not even asserting notability? --DAJF 02:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete –. Vanity piece. Shoessss |  Chat  02:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Close to, but probably not over, the WP:CSD no-assertion-of-notability line. —David Eppstein 03:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: There is a minor assertion of notability (though it is unsourced). Not notable. - Rjd0060 05:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No support for claimed notability, which only looks marginal at best anyway. Serious WP:AUTO problem with this user: even his talk page and user page have been deleted several times as blatant spam/nn-bio/etc. DMacks 05:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Could have been either or  . Andante1980 09:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: No sources of notability Printer222 11:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. COI is not a criterion for deletion (only for denial of ability to climb on the quality scale) but lack of notability and lack of reliable sources are. --Blanchardb- Me  MyEarsMyMouth-timed 17:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.