Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerry DeCaire


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. One (talk) 00:28, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Jerry DeCaire

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced article about unnotable illustrator Alexius08 (talk) 23:57, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Close nomination Nominator did not apply WP:BEFORE and failed to explain WHY the person is not notable. - Mgm|(talk) 09:50, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete per nom. Limited/no sourcing (neither of the two links given in the article seem to work), and not really very much in the way of even unsourced assertions of notability. Tevildo (talk) 16:27, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not appear to be notable. GT5162 (我的对话页) 16:32, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  —Emperor (talk) 16:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep there does appear to be some coverage but they seem to all disappeared from the Net  and are proving tricky to bring back from the dead (I was getting the article through the Internet Archive and then it said it was blocked) but sources like Midland Daily News and The Saginaw News have their own articles here so could be useful if we can access the content. However, it might be they aren't much use when we do find them but I'll go for weak keep until I can see them (I'm keeping on this to see what I can do). Equally the article reads like an ad/resume and needs a thorough rewrite but that shouldn't really be enough to get it deleted. (Emperor (talk) 16:44, 20 April 2009 (UTC))


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.