Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerry Romano


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. S warm  ♠  19:31, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Jerry Romano

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable local producer. References are trivial single line listings and lack depth, are PR related, or are picture captions. red dogsix (talk) 20:36, 1 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Rubbish computer 01:53, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep He is the Chairman and Executive Producer of New York Emmy Awards, a major organization. Even the recipients of the New York Emmy Awards are considered notable.--Dolly Cao (talk) 02:29, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Please show us how this meets the Criteria for inclusion into Wikipedia.  red dogsix (talk) 05:07, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:38, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:38, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:38, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as puffery. 1. Producers are almost never considered automatically notable, due to the ordinary and common nature of their work and that fact that most TV shows and stations have several producers, unlike film directors and other creative people. I personally know three (3) television producers in New York/New Jersey markets alone, good long-time friends, one of whom has won New York Emmy Awards; they all complain about how meaningless their jobs are, how much turnover there is amongst their co-workers, and how little they get paid despite having gone to college.  My domestic partner produced a film that appears on IMDB and was in the Cannes Film Festival.  So what?  While the local Emmy awards themselves are wonderful and notable, merely winning one from the New York, New York local market, is not considered notable by itself.  3. Producers must meet basic rules of notability, which include having significant coverage in multiple good sources. 4. Wikipedia is not a resume website or social media. We are a private charity that actually has some standards. Not everybody gets their own page. Bearian (talk) 19:26, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * P.S. As if to make my point, this month's AARP noted, "female producers" ... are "notable [b]ecause only 17 percent of directors, producers [etc.] ... working on major feature films are women, reports San Diego State University." (see here for the article.) The subject is male, as are all four of my friends heretofore mentioned, thus another reason they are not notable. Bearian (talk) 20:36, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment I do not consider the NYC (or the LA) as purely local markets for television or other mass media. But Iagreethae status of all local emmys is dubious as a proof of notability.  DGG ( talk ) 00:51, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the clarification, . Bearian (talk) 13:05, 5 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete fails the criteria for WP:GNG W i k i 92 man  (Talk/Stalk) 12:34, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't meet ''WP:GNG. A google news search didn't come up with anything to help his notability either.  Onel 5969  TT me 21:26, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.