Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jersey Girls (stereotype)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:20, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Jersey Girls (stereotype)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article fails WP:NPOV, fails to cite any reliable sources, and takes the form of an attack page. It is largely an opinion article and I don't see how it's inclusion could benefit Wikipedia. HarlandQPitt (talk) 18:09, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete There is no indication in the current article that this is a notable term. The article is unsourced and very close to crossing the line as an attack page.  I can not find significant coverage of this term in reliable sources to establish notability.   GB fan  talk 18:38, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Aside from "girl from New Jersey" jokes, I am not sure there is any mention of this topic in secondary sources. The current article is pure original research. Abductive  (reasoning) 19:19, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. If it wasn't meant as a prank, it's definitely unreffed original research. Moriori (talk) 22:22, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: not worth saving, even if a real article could be created in the future.--Milowent (talk) 03:35, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.