Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerusalem Biennale


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Notability more than asserted under WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 01:43, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Jerusalem Biennale

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No attempt to provide evidence of notability. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:40, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:37, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:37, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

This is a silly discussion to be having. A Biennial is a Biennial. Now Jerusalem has one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by E.M.Gregory (talk • contribs) 01:10, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Even if so far there is not much of useful information as only one event took place, it will likely to get beefed up as time passes. If it was cancelled now, I would argue for deletion but as it should/would have a 2nd event in 6 months, I suggest cancelling the nomination for now and reevaluating in early 2016. Ashtul (talk) 09:18, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep True, when this article was nominated it was about a "first annual" art fair and had no sources. I have added sources to this Biennial art fair officially recognized by Venice Biennale, of a type now popular worldwide .  first annual (2013) event was covered in  major newspapers.  Reliable sources added about preparations for 2015 Biennale.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:01, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY. There were several errors, such as lack of citations and a wrote date, but they have been fixed through the ordinary editing process.  Plenty of significant coverage in reliable sources attest to the notability of this art show. Bearian (talk) 17:28, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.