Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jess Davidson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 11:26, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Jess Davidson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Many problems with this article, including almost no notability. Apples&#38;Manzanas (talk) 21:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  J947 's public account 21:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions.  J947 's public account 21:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:55, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Further comment: Out of the references used, the only headlines that she is mentioned in is the university of denver magazine and a student magazine from the university of denver (duclarion). It seems she attended the university of denver at the time of publication. This is obviously very insignificant coverage. Apples&#38;Manzanas (talk) 22:06, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - a person does not need to be named in the headline for significant coverage, which this person has: "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." For example, in the Time article, Davidson is quoted three times; similar material is in several of the other reliable sources. There are certainly things I'd edit in the article, but AfD is not for fixing such trifles.Bearian (talk) 19:21, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Being quoted can't increase his her notability - it would be inherently non-independent, unless there's actually accompanying content about the individual directly. Nosebagbear (talk) 23:55, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Her* Apples&#38;Manzanas (talk) 02:43, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Reply - you get your name in a newspaper and you get a wikipedia article? No way. I think myself and every person i know has got their name into a 'reliable source' at some point in their lives. WP: GNG stipulates that "significant coverage addresses the topic directly and in detail". The time magazine article isn't even about her, nor does it address her in detail. This should be a snowball delete, i dont even see how it's an edge case. Apples&#38;Manzanas (talk) 01:54, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:57, 11 December 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * This should be an easy delete, there are no sources in the world (that i know of) that address the individual "directly and in detail"...Except for the university of denver magazine and the university of denver student magazine...and as she attended the university of denver, that's kind of insignificant (school magazines write about their students all of the time). Perhaps the organization she represents deserves a page, but the case for her having her own page is very thin. Apples&#38;Manzanas (talk) 02:43, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. An easy call. There's no significant coverage of her. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:15, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - Nahal (T) 20:04, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - She has passing mention in several high quality RS's, but is only given direct coverage in a couple university rags. Not quite sure that cuts mustard. NickCT (talk) 20:45, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete the only coverage is by  university publications o fher own university. Such publications are usually indiscriminate, and therefore not RSs for notability  DGG ( talk ) 09:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.