Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Benns


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Jesse Benns

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

An article on a percussionist. The given references are mainly press releases and passing mentions, with the exception of a Meinl profile page, which is connected so cannot serve as a reliable 3rd party source. The subject has performed with several groups (on one of which the article creator previously created an article which was rejected at AfC); there is also a Trevor Babajack Steger article may have some claim to notability due to a UK Blues Acoustic Act of the Year award, but I am not seeing evidence that the present article meets any of the WP:MUSICBIO notability criteria. AllyD (talk) 12:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England. AllyD (talk) 12:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Unsure why Meinl artist page cannot be considered a reliable source - they are one of the top percussion manufacturers in the world, and if they endorse an artist this should make them a person or interest. Also as you stated, the subject performs with a UK Blues acoustic act of the year winner, which is further interest. 95.146.0.25 (talk) 12:24, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 * PROMO is what we're worried about. Oaktree b (talk) 14:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: Lack of RS, not much of anything found for this musician. Hits on others with the same name, but nothing for this individual. Oaktree b (talk) 14:28, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Upon googling this artists name, at least in the UK, every result is specifically about this artist, apart from one from ancestry. There is also a knowledge panel generated by Google for the artist, which I believe proves credibility. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.146.0.25 (talk) 12:09, 30 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 15:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * When the knowledge panel is generated from Wikipedia, it would be circular to suggest that it can demonstrate the subject's notability for Wikipedia. The Google search results are showing links to the subject's own social media pages, plus passing mentions of the subject's name - unless you can identify some which are detailed critical commentary about this subject? AllyD (talk) 21:07, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.