Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse H. Neal Award


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 17:40, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Jesse H. Neal Award

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable award, fails WP:GNG. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  22:41, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 00:12, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

KEEP Is there an article here? Clearly not, or not yet. Poorly written with haste to secure a spot on Wikipedia. But I have to disagree it easily passes WP:GNG there plenty of coverage and the subject is notable. The article needs to be developed. Freetheangels (talk) 04:45, 19 September 2018 (UTC) Striking sockpuppet !vote: WP:SOCKSTRIKE --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:46, 6 October 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete website is now at . Page creator described it as a minor industry award, the references I find are press releases about nominations.  The related American Business Media should probably be deleted as well; if there's enough content to expand that (and rename, probably to Connectiv), this page could redirect there. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 15:20, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg  jhp  jm  01:01, 24 September 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg  jhp  jm  01:54, 1 October 2018 (UTC) KEEP We would commit a grave mistake in deleting this article. This is the "pulitzer Prize of the business press"; it is well-reputed and it shows up in plenty of reputable press. The article is poorly written, indeed, but that is never a reason to delete it. Caballero / Historiador⎌ 10:11, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete It is definitely a niche award, hence the lack of coverage (other than blurbs about winners). Business awards often fail WP:GNG, the business publishing industry seems to be no exception. It is possible that there is significant coverage of the award other than mentions in niche publications, but it hasn't come to light. --Bejnar (talk) 00:20, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per RoySmith and because you have to be a member of non-notable SIIA entity to play. I also just nominated Code Award (AfD) from same SIIA entity. --David Tornheim (talk) 01:06, 11 October 2018 (UTC) Keep award from 1955 of some distinction.  Seems to have quite a bit of WP:RS.  Also, per Caballero1967's find that it is the "The pulitzer Prize of the business press".  --David Tornheim (talk) 09:52, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a "pay to play" business award.  Entry fee is $195 (the cost goes up for late submissions).  Credit cards accepted.  No refunds for any reason.    I don't see any WP:RS talking about the award as a topic, just a few hits that mention people who have won the award.  Fails WP:GNG.  -- RoySmith (talk) 23:55, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks to for the info. Also you have to be a member of non-notable SIIA entity to play. I changed my vote. I also just nominated Code Award (AfD). --David Tornheim (talk) 01:06, 11 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.