Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Head


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. One article from the subject's hometown and another that literally only mentions him in the context of someone writing in to a newspaper because they saw him in a minor role and couldn't figure out who he was is hardly sufficient to back up a claim of notability. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:18, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Jesse Head

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable actor. No evidence of secondary sources. Inappropriately sourced using just IMDB since 2009. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:36, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:36, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:36, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:36, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:36, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:42, 9 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. No roles that can be considered major, and no discussion about him or his work in reliable sources. -- Kinu t/c 22:52, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete That this totally lacking in anything even remotely like a reliable source article has existed since 2006 is a travesty.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:16, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per Nom. Unsourced and so non-notable that even the inappropriately used IMDb source and the article content conflicts. This article states the subject is "best known for" co-staring in the sitcom So Little Time. This is not sourced. IMDb lists only two, that he is "known for" Zombies of the Living Dead (2015) and "Grid Street" (2018). Neither one of these are listed in the article. As a BLP the criteria is higher for sourcing. A "Before" search returned such sites as IMDb, other celebrity sites such as DatingCelebs, Fandom, celebrityhow.com, famousbirthdays.com, trendcelebsnow.com, facebook, and TV.com. At a bare minimum this subject does not pass any notability criteria for a stand alone article. Otr500 (talk) 01:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: The page would definitely need to be cleaned up, but it does seem as though the subject can make a weak case for WP:NACTOR, with significant roles in Katie Joplin, So Little Time, Summerland, Norman (film) and Firebreather (film). Sourcing is the problem here, but I've found a couple of articles at newspapers.com and I will post them as soon as I receive them back from WP:RX. So, for the moment, I'm voting "Keep". Dflaw4 (talk) 12:46, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Here are two articles, the second of which goes over two pages: here, here and here. They aren't the greatest of sources, but they're better than nothing and they provide verification for a number of his roles. Dflaw4 (talk) 14:04, 15 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.