Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Hirsh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:28, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Jesse Hirsh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

PROD'ed in hopes of prompting RS for an article with no sign on notability, but tag removed without explanation Avidreader79 (talk) 20:28, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:22, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:22, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:22, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:22, 1 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Added a couple sources. Looking at how often he has been cited in The Star and The Globe and Mail he's a known "Internet specialist". There are probably many more sources but have not looked too hard after seeing this. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 07:47, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Hirsh is a reasonably well known media commentator in Canada, so I do think it's probable that there are other sources out there about him that could be added. That said, I agree that what's here right now ain't great, and he's not a topic that I personally have enough of an investment in to justify spending my time trying to track down additional sources to improve it. If somebody is willing to do that, I'm prepared to reconsider — but given the ways in which WP:BLP has been tightened up over the years I don't see a lot of value in keeping this version of an article about him just because somebody might eventually get around to improving it. Delete; if somebody wants to start a new article about him in the future which cites stronger sources than this, then by all means go for it. Bearcat (talk) 20:03, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:12, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 14:32, 16 October 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.