Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse jantzen

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 11:38, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Jesse jantzen
Non-notable poorly-written vanity. Arguably a state-record-holder might be notable, but I disagree. LizardWizard 01:28, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC) *Delete - Drivel --Brookie 19:25, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * delete.Mikkalai 01:52, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable enough, possible vanity. Megan1967 02:52, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. vanity. Brim 05:47, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity. Nothing really notable. Zzyzx11 06:53, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete but have a look at the most hilariously awful final paragraph ever to grace a WP vanity page. Classic. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 17:34, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and make sure it goes to the deleted nonsense page. :) --Sn0wflake 18:25, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Jonathunder 05:44, 2005 Feb 19 (UTC)