Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Nom withdrew. SynergeticMaggot 00:22, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Jessel
Original research. JD [ don't talk|email ] 18:26, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Rklawton 18:40, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as neologism, fails WP:V and possibly WP:NOR, and how is this encyclopedic in any event? Fair enough, this looks legit now.  Keep.  RGTraynor 18:53, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP is not for things made up in school. --Ginkgo100 talk · contribs · e@ 18:54, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete; hoax, nonsense, unverifiable. --MCB 21:24, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, I have no idea what this is. WP:NFT, is WP:OR, fails WP:V, and there really should be something called WP:CRAP. -- Kinu  t /c  23:07, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * No vote for the disambiguation page. Looks useful enough, but make sure that all the redlinks actually should be there to encourage/discourage article creation as appropriate. -- Kinu t /c  15:58, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Hyper Anthony 23:09, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Zoiks! - it appears that the original article had been vandalized, and the vandalized version was the one nominated for deletion. The version prior to the vandalism is a legit disambiguation page.  Please revisit the restored page (with AfD tag in place)
 * Comment: it looks as if the article uses "pedigree" as if it meant "family". And why would this be a "Christian family name" but a "Jewish pedigree". Is there even any such a thing as a "Christian family name"? up+l+and 07:29, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Withdraw Nomination I didn't know this was a vandalised disambiguation page, I should have checked first when I didn't. I'm sorry for wasting peoples' time.  -- JD [ don't talk|email ] 16:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Eh, don't worry about it. WP:RCP usually does a good job at catching this stuff, but obviously it slipped through this time. It was obviously a good faith nomination, so no harm done. -- Kinu  t /c  18:52, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.