Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Bangkok


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:40, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Jessica Bangkok

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:PORNBIO, no indication the subject can satisfy the GNG or any other SNG. No nontrivial GNews or GBooks hits. No multiple-year award noms, no awards. No reliable/nonpromotional sourcing. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:14, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The sources I found said that she was nominated for the awards cited in the article, but I just looked at the links again and it looks like that info was taken away for some reason. I can look into it some more when I get home from work, but if I can't find anything reliable, I won't lose sleep over a deletion.  Erpert  Who is this guy? 00:52, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, wait a minute...wouldn't this qualify as a major award? It's an AVN nomination from its official site (I guess they list their nominees via PDF files now).  Erpert  Who is this guy? 09:14, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Only nominations, not actual awards won. WP:PORNBIO requires multiple nominations in different years; so the subject fails the specific SNG, and WP:ANYBIO requires that the subject "often" be nominated, so the claim there is similarly insufficient. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks like she was also nominated in 2009.  Erpert  Who is this guy? 16:09, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Given that, I'm willing to withdraw the nomination without prejudice toward future relisting. I don't know that categories like "Unsung Siren" should really be construed as indicating notability; they can fairly be interpreted as something like "not actually notable, doesn't really have coverage, but ought to be more famous" -- not a standard we accept in most other contexts. But this AFD as it stands isn't a good place to have that sort of discussion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:24, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:05, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:05, 6 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per Erpert's detective work.SPNic (talk) 20:40, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per Erpert's work.--Johnsmith877 (talk) 13:13, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep thanks to Erpert's work.--Cavarrone (talk) 10.59, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.