Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Bangkok (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 03:23, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Jessica Bangkok
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Was kept before when PORNBIO was significantly looser. No longer meets that standard and appears non notable Spartaz Humbug! 20:03, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:17, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:19, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:19, 14 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:PORNBIO, WP:BIO, and WP:GNG. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 21:21, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * This doesn't count for anything?  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 23:29, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * not in my book no. Spartaz Humbug! 08:28, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * It's not exactly a notable "Time's Most Influential" list, no, and any such list where Asia Carrera isn't #1 is BS. IMO. Tarc (talk) 12:37, 18 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - notable. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   15:51, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * This editor always votes keep in porn-related AfD debates. See also WP:ITSNOTABLE. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * No closing admin worth his/her salt pays the slightest attention to "keep it's notable!" opinions, esp from this one in this topic area. Tarc (talk) 12:37, 18 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO with only award nominations. A one-paragraph mention in a magazine isn't enough to satisfy WP:GNG. Searches for RS coverage get only passing mentions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete This person does not meet the notability requirments of pornographic actors.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:40, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above; my media sweeps came up dry.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 15:17, 17 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Multiple nominations are no longer a pornbio criteria qualifier, and no adequate coverage in independent reliable sources. Tarc (talk) 12:37, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per above fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 22:12, 19 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.