Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Benites


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 23:17, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Jessica Benites

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Previous AfD closed as procedural keep with no prejudice against another AfD if the player was still deemed not to be notable. No evidence of even coming close to meeting the standards for biographical notability. Clear WP:GNG failure. She may have made occasional appearances in a title-winning team but that in itself does not give you inherent notability. Sources found do not cover her in any depth. Best sources were, and  all of which only mention her once. No active career. Spiderone 14:20, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  14:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  14:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  14:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  14:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  14:23, 24 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 11:22, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article about footballer who appeared in the 2017 Liga MX Femenil title match, but who has never played in a fully-pro league and is not the subject of significant coverage in Spanish- or English-language sources (she appears in match reports but nothing that would be in-depth coverage). Jogurney (talk) 21:20, 28 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.