Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica De Nova


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:07, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Jessica De Nova

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable journalist/anchor. She has received no in depth coverage, everything is usually her reporting or local pieces about her immigration and the award is an honorable mention, so not really worth much wrt notability.This is perhaps too soon. Praxidicae (talk) 13:43, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:52, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:52, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:52, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:52, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:52, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:52, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete I concur, it might be TOOSOON for her to have an article. Nominator is 100%. Missvain (talk) 04:24, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm obviously for keeping this, so just thought I'd weigh in here. Cheers, --Caterpillar84 (talk) 00:15, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete there is some coverage of her by her own own employer, but not coverage by publications other than the one that employs her.NotButtigieg (talk) 22:20, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Journalist has been working nearly a decade, and has done so in multiple media markets in the U.S., which is significant.Rebelx24 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:33, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:NJOURNALIST. No significant coverage of her personally, and an honorable mention for a minor award doesn't help either. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:59, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NJOURNALIST. The bulk of the references simply show her doing her job; there seem to be no independent sources specifically about her as required by WP:RS. Possibly WP:TOOSOON; no prejudice against recreation. Narky Blert (talk) 12:01, 21 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.