Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Dunton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was 'Delete, nn-bio. Madchester 06:49, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Jessica_Dunton
This looks like a fairly transparent "vanity" case. Bardencj 19:22, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn-bio. Ruby 19:38, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article even uses the term "struggling actress."  Pretty much by definition, that's non-notable.  Maybe if she was notable for her struggling...  Anyway, the heavy POV ("hilarious", "one of the better struggling actresses") smacks of promotion (self- or otherwise).  Powers 19:50, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Vizcarra 21:20, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above James084 21:21, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No case for notability - nn-bio candidate. She has her own website, so she can post any and everything that she wants on there instead.   (aeropagitica)   21:22, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. A significant number of legitimate theatrical credits, including being a contract player in a university-sponsored theatrical company. The article itself is lousy, and obviously written by a fan. But since Wikipedia treats any actress who's been cast three times as "Topless Blonde," every Pokemon character, and everyone who claims to have married a dolphin as notable, it's ridiculous to claim that a working theatrical actress with a clearly nontrivial resume should be written out. Monicasdude 22:54, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable enough. Latinus 23:48, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Blatant vanity.  And to Monicasdude, I don't believe anything you listed is notable, myself. --Brian1979 15:04, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.