Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Elway (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge. JYolkowski // talk 22:58, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Jessica Elway
This article was kept as a result of its first nomination last year (Articles for deletion/Jessica Elway). It had four keep votes and 6 delete votes, plus a vote to abstain; one keep vote was from an anon, and another was based on her future potential in college basketball. She played one season of college basketball two years ago for Stanford, left the team before this past season, and hasn't played since. (She is not listed on their active roster, and this would be her junior year.) I recommend deleting the content and possibly setting up a redirect. --Idont Havaname (Talk) 23:01, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to John Elway. —C.Fred (talk) 23:32, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Normally I'm not an inclusionist but this quote from the article struck a chord with me for some reason.. Jessica made history by becoming the first woman to ever introduce somebody into the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Clearly a weak reason to keep, but I'm going with it. DrunkenSmurf 02:46, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect/Merge to daddy. -- GWO
 * Merge/Redirect to John Elway. The QB's article has very little personal information, so this would make an interesting seed for a section on his family. &mdash; RJH (talk) 14:39, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable, and I'm not convinced that we ave to put details of everyone's relations in their articles.--Runcorn 22:00, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge. Though I'll agree that the bit about being the first woman to make an introduction for the Hall of Fame, gave me pause, it ultimately wasn't enough for me to justify a separate article.  The information should definitely be merged into her father's article though. --Elonka 22:13, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.