Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Jane Peterson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:01, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Jessica Jane Peterson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 17:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:46, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:47, 21 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. The appearance on a single TV show episode will not be significant.  only (talk) 02:32, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Making a one-off appearance on a reality show is not an automatic notability freebie in and of itself, and the references aren't solid enough to pass WP:GNG — of the footnotes present here, #1 is a user-generated "anybody can write 'coverage' about absolutely anything they want" platform which is quite routinely abused by wikiwannabes to distribute self-published sourcing in lieu of real media coverage, and thus cannot be used to assist notability at all; #2 completely fails to mention her name at all unless she's the surnameless "Jessica" whose role in the article is limited to holding a balloon for another performer; #3 is a deadlinked PDF on the personal website of a colleague; and #6 is a press release on the PR website of the network that airs the reality show she's going to appear on, which makes it a primary source that cannot assist notability either. And of the two references here that do count as reliable sources, one is a deadlink and the other just namechecks her as a provider of soundbite in an article whose subject is a theatre in her own hometown, not her qua her. Which means none of this is sufficient to make her notable enough for an article as of today. Bearcat (talk) 20:55, 23 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.