Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Jordan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JForget 22:54, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Jessica Jordan

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable individual - no coverage in significant third party sources of the sort we would associate with a notable individuals. Cameron Scott (talk) 11:15, 31 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - She's a Miss Bolivia winner. That would indicate that notability is likely to be established.  A search reveals multiple reliable sources writing about her although much of it is not in English which is not surprising for a Bolivian person.  There is this (english) article in the Christian Science Monitor  which is non-trivial coverage although she is not the main subject.  There is also, , and in Vietnamese.  I stopped looking at more of teh search results from Google News at this point because it's quite clear that this is enough to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 22:20, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  22:46, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - As shown here Ms. Jordon has not only local coverage, but international coverage.  It also seems that  Ms. Jordon is not only a pretty face, but is gathering quite a political clout in her country (Boliva that is, not the UK).  Regarding the nomination statement "...no coverage in significant third party sources of the sort we would associate with a notable individuals", have I missed a new policy or guideline that names specific sources we can use or not use.  My understanding was that if the source was verifiable - reliable - creditable and thrid party, it was fine to use.  Thanks. ShoesssS Talk 23:02, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.