Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Lindgren


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirect to Big Brother (Sweden and Norway). The relevant info (i.e. that she won one year) is already there, and there's little else to keep.Cúchullain t/ c 16:29, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Jessica Lindgren

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Person only known for participating and winning the sixth season of Big Brother in Sweden. Any other mention of her is based on the fact that she's done cosmetic surgery. Strangnet 18:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong keep She is likely to be well known and have had independent media coverage. Epbr123 18:31, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Are future probability, likelyhood or chance of fame and notability a factor to consider in biographical articles? --Strangnet 18:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * No, she has already had fame and notability. Epbr123 18:39, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment From WP:N - Notable is defined as "worthy of being noted" or "attracting notice"; it is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance". And from WP:BIO - A person is notable if he or she has been the subject of secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject. Please use Wikipedia guidelines in future. One Night In Hackney 303 11:14, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I said, as she is famous, she is likely to have had independent media coverage. Please follow WP:CIVIL in future. Epbr123 13:50, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I was perfectly civil, I directed you to guidelines you tend to ignore when you choose, as evidenced by your many WP:POINT violating AfD nominations. If there's independent media coverage, please provide it rather than prevaricating. One Night In Hackney 303 13:54, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * WP:AGF. Epbr123 14:07, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Comment: if your opinion should be used we should have to delete all Reality show stars here on Wiki.--Matrix17 11:27, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Notability is asserted this person she was oen of the most written about poerson last year in the reality show genre in Sweden.If a reality show isnt notability then we have to delete all reality show personalities.--Matrix17 11:07, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Well, given her "huge" and "apparent" notability, it's really strange that not more information is available in the article of what she's actually achieved. Deleting all reality show participants that have failed to be notable before or after they participate should be given if you read WP:BIO. The tabloidal fame is artificial since they live in symbiosis with each other - without one the other chokes. --Strangnet 11:16, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unless evidence of passing WP:BIO are provided. One Night In Hackney 303 11:14, 31 March

Comment: wow 7 minutes and then hackney comes and gives delete. what a surprise. No but seriously she is notable.She is also a model for Moore Magazine which make her notable.--Matrix17 11:18, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Comment: Strangnets nomination isnt 100% truthfull she has done modeling and is a requested model she also lives in spain and is pregnant which i wrote but was deleted as "gossip"--Matrix17 11:54, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Clarification left on user's talk page. --Strangnet 12:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Comment: Here are some sources, , , , , , , , , ,. Can we speedy close this discussion now? Epbr123 14:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Comment: Yes we can close this dicsussion now.--90.225.121.21 15:13, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Comment: Well this page has been on this wiki since december 2006 and has been edited a number of times, why is it suddenly not notable,i respect the decisions but i just find it funny --Matrix17 19:52, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect into relevant BB article. There's very little content worthy of an independent article. The JPS talk to me  17:41, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per above. The fact that she has been pregnant and lives in Spain does not exactly add much to her notability. Also, Matrix17 has canvassed this vote on a number of one user page, for example here . Mackan 18:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * From WP:N - 'Notable is defined as "worthy of being noted" or "attracting notice"; it is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance"'. Epbr123 19:44, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Comment: Mackan, name and reference one more i have as oyu called it "Canvassed",please i really want to see it. And i think all people have an own opinion, i dont think me suggesting a thing make that person do what i say, everyone has an own opinion.--Matrix17 19:40, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Re: Matrix17 -- Just because something has been on Wikipedia for a while does not necessarily make it notable. Sometimes articles fall through the cracks -- it happens. Please stop attacking other users and please stop telling people to vote for an article on their talk pages. AfDs are a discussion, not a majority vote. Rockstar915 23:26, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Commént:Rockstar i was attacked so i attacked back to false accusations nothing more nothing less. And do you see a vote from the person i so called "Cancassed" no i dont see it. So i guess their is no issue.bye bye. And i sitll think jessica is notable. but anyway lets keep her.And just for the record just because i am not popular here doesnt make it right to come and falsly accuse me of stuff. --Matrix17 12:33, 3 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep, Winner of Big Brother (any season, any country) is notable enough.--ZayZayEM 02:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.