Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Matten


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bearcat is correct in saying that redirecting to one of the two shows she appears in would be in violation of WP:XY, and redirects like this are typically taken to RFD and deleted. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 15:57, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Jessica Matten

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable actress that has appeared in a television show. There are no references to independent reliable sources with significant covrage. Notability is not inherited. Does not meet WP:GNG. Only reference presently in article is just an interview. Notability has not been established. Antonioatrylia (talk) 00:23, 15 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Frontier (2016 TV series). Cullen328  Let's discuss it  07:47, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:40, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Cullen328.  Montanabw (talk) 02:39, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:14, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:14, 27 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect per Cullen328.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:32, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. She's had two roles that were "significant" enough to potentially be the expected redirect target — Frontier is in an WP:XY competition with Blackstone, so redirecting to Frontier would be a POV violation. No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when there's more solid reliable source coverage about her than has been shown here, but an actress doesn't clear WP:NACTOR just because multiple roles are listed — she clears NACTOR when she's properly shown to have garnered significant non-trivial media coverage for those roles, and she just hasn't gotten there yet. Bearcat (talk) 14:17, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.