Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Simpson's fifth studio album


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Maxim (talk)  (contributions)  17:58, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Jessica Simpson's fifth studio album
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Hopelessly unverifiable crystalgazing article. Will (talk) 16:34, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep for all articles you've nominated. If they've announced that it will be recorded, why should it be deleted? It's going to get created again anyway. IrkCome in for a drink! 16:58, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Uh, your reason isn't in the speedy keep deadlines, and even if it is being announced it will be recorded, there's no guarentee on its release (e.g. Chinese Democracy - that's notable, however, for being pushed back a dozen times). Will (talk) 17:06, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete because it fails WP:CRYSTAL. There are no references, no specific details, and the first line of the article reads "Details of the album are currently unknown," which is unencyclopedic. – Dream out loud  (talk) 17:56, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This is what WP:CRYSTAL was written for. - Mtmelendez (Talk 18:16, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as unsourced crystal-ballery. Nominator encouraged to combine similar listings like this in the future. Stifle (talk) 18:19, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete There are no sources to support the elements and thus fails WP:CRYSTAL.-- JForget 00:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.