Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessie Andrews filmography


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 01:00, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Jessie Andrews filmography

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Wikipedia is not simply a collection of facts (WP:TRIVIA). Porn films are, as evidenced by this list, produced at such a high rate as to diminish their notability on an individual basis. Though only a WikiProject WP:P* suggests only listing films that are themselves notable. This list is just a way to try to get around that. Andrews is no more or less prolific than any other porn star and this is just listcruft (WP:LISTCRUFT). Dismas |(talk) 01:57, 15 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Dismas |(talk) 02:08, 15 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:NOTDIRECTORY — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:14, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 15 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect and Merge a trimmed version back to the existing Jessie Andrews. I note that we DO allow longer separate lists of an actor's filmography without calling such indiscriminate or trivial lists (LISTCRUFT) or a list or repository of loosely associated topics (NOTDIRECTORY). This list is not indiscriminate nor is it a list of loosely associated topics. I believe the issue here is simply that someone is testing the waters and wishes the same sort of filmography list for this porn actress as we allow for mainstream actors. IF all the films on that list had notability enough for separate articles, a separate list might then be worth considering as a proper spin-out of the main topic. But that is not the case.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:50, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. For God's sake. Every item on the list is linked to a vendor page where the item can be purchased. There's been a longstanding practice, representing an established consensus, that laundry lists of non-notable videos don't even belong in porn performer bios, let alone in independent articles. Obviously a promotional editor at work, especially given their editing history. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:17, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per Hullaballoo Wolfowitz and WP:NOTDIRECTORY. This is listcruft. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete There is no need for that. The main part of the listed titles are non notable. Cavarrone (talk) 16:27, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: Does not quite qualify for a speedy. The list is improperly sourced, and should go for that reason perhaps, but some of them link to existing sourced articles. Those listed that are bluelinks, can be included in the article on the subject as is common practice for actors.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 17:14, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Two films might be notable out of more than a hundred… I can't see any use to this and Wikipedia is not merely a directory.  One of the notations at WP:LISTCRUFT is to the effect that the list will take a disproportionate amount of effort to maintain and, since the performer in question appears to make a movie every three days or so, there would be little possibility of it ever being complete.  Ubelowme (talk) 19:10, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge any notable content not current on the actresses page, if her awards are already mentioned there, delete. The links to purchase need to be removed. OSborn arfcontribs. 21:45, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete listcruft. Hipocrite (talk) 19:00, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.