Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesuit Social Center Osaka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:21, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Jesuit Social Center Osaka

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:GNG, advertising. Article is only based on related sources and not much else can be found. The Banner talk 18:48, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Serious WP:NPOV issues ("The interior joy and peace felt by some of these denizens of the inner city is also a revelation to many who visit") could be addressed with editing, leaving a small stub. But searches show that the subject has not received significant coverage in multiple, reliable, independent sources. Searches find first-hand accounts, interviews, and passing mentions in Osaka volunteer newsletters, blogs, minutes of local civic meetings, and a few religious outlets, most of which would be considered primary sources and none of which pass the WP:GNG guidelines. The organization clearly exists and does things, but it does not appear to be notable by Wikipedia standards. Bakazaka (talk) 19:46, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:49, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:49, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:50, 6 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete complete lack of independent souring in the article, and in a web search. Entirely fails any notability test.96.127.243.251 (talk) 03:53, 7 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.