Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesus Camp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete as a copyright violation of a copyrighted ("2004-2006 © Emanuel Levy") non-GFDL web page, with no prejudice against a future, non-violating, article based upon the sources turned up by Captainktainer below. Uncle G 00:28, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Jesus Camp
Non-notable film, article appears to be vanity peice. Prod removed from article with no reason Wildthing61476 21:49, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - clear violation of WP:VAIN --Daniel Olsen 21:57, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. As of right now, there are no reliable sources in this article.  It definitely appears to be vanity, based on the "Director's statement," the first person language at points, and the signatures at the end. If reliable sources are produced I may change my mind, but I haven't been able to find any, personally (possibly because the title is fairly common as a joke and as a title for blogs, entries about religious camps, etc)...  Srose   (talk)  22:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - copyvio. However, the film itself is notable; it has an IMDB page and has been screened at the higly notable TriBeCa Film Fest. The NYTimes seems to think it's worth a mention. It's also notable for the controversy that it's stirred up. Captainktainer * Talk 22:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep If film is notable, then should not be deleted. Just needs to be cleaned up to remove any copyvios.  will381796 23:09, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Did you read the article and the link? The entire article is a copyvio. You don't cleanup a copyvio, you speedily delete it. Captainktainer * Talk 00:21, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * We don't keep copyright violations. We especially do not create derived works from them.  This is non-negotiable, since our free content copyright licence is a fundamental part of the project.  Please read our Copyright policy. Uncle G 00:28, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.