Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesus Freak Hideout (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 19:44, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Jesus Freak Hideout
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Both the article talk page and the notability banner, tagged since November 2011, lead me to the conclusion that this fails our notability threshold for web sites/web based material Fiddle   Faddle  12:44, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: This is inane.HotHat (talk) 13:14, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 30 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep It even meets WP:GNG, although the sources are now dead links. Perhaps we should find new sources. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:07, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep—GNews search shows that they've been quoted (or conducted interviews which were then quoted) three times, by two RSes... and dissed once by the Guardian. While not a super-high level of notability, I think it's just barely there.  Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 18:04, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep In addition to what has been said in the above comments, the site has also received notice for its compilations:, . See also WikiProject Christian music/Sources (archive).-- &iquest;3fam  ily6  contribs 21:50, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per all of the above. I disagreed and argued against the placement of the notability tag in the first place.  Royal broil  04:38, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per the comments on the original AFD. This site seems to be one of the mainstays of the Christian music scene and if it were a magazine with similar reach it would not face questions about notability. I quite understand, by the way, the natural caution about creating articles for websites, but the scepticism is more than met here. JASpencer (talk) 07:57, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.