Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jet2.net


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0 [ talk ] 16:30, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Jet2.net
Article does not establish notability under WP:CORP, ends up sounding a lot like spam. --Alan Au 22:58, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Not notable, per nom. BTW I am Canadian!!! Mike 00:09, 14 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment: "Not notable, per nom" is not currently a criterion for speedy deletion. Please clarify which of the criteria you think it meets, or adjust your vote. Stifle 00:52, 15 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Creator's Rebuttal — I highly doubt it's spam, since i referenced my work and have used it, AND MNSi as my ISPs in the past. I feel it should be kept, for the reason of it being a legitimate canadian company. I now feel this is another sad case of people wanting me to leave wikipedia by pressuring me (through deleting every topic i make or add to). Do i sense a bit of anti-canadian sentiment? Raccoon Fox 23:48, 13 January 2006 (UTC)


 * the views of the ringtail:

i just thought if other ISPs were listed, why not add three that are in my city? they're also served by a huge amount of people in Windsor, Essex County, and surrounding areas.

they may not be important to someone in say... San Antonio or england, but they might be of interest to anyone on wikipedia, even from the windsor area, Especially if one is moving to the area and wanted to find out what ISPs are in windsor....i'm just trying to share information with others in a productive manner.


 * Speedy delete spam. --Terence Ong 08:41, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: "Spam" is not currently a criterion for speedy deletion. Please clarify which of the criteria you think it meets, or adjust your vote. Stifle 00:52, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete -- Krash 19:19, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Please clarify which of the criteria for speedy deletion you think it meets, or adjust your vote. Stifle 00:52, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable and/or non-notable company. See WP:CORP. Stifle 00:52, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CORP. - Mailer Diablo 04:59, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CORP. *drew 07:40, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. And since no one has died and left him in charge, if Stifle doesn't like it, it's his problem, not mine. --Calton | Talk 05:00, 16 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.