Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JetBlue Airways Flight 191 (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:21, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

JetBlue Airways Flight 191
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I do not think this article has any long term notability. Most articles similar actually included a hijacking. In year to come this will simply mean nothing. The incident didnt bring any change to the industry Media coverage of the incident doesn't create notability. JetBlast (talk) 20:00, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment sorry i didn't know this had been listed before. I looked for the tag on the talk page but some how totally missed it. Sorry. --JetBlast (talk) 20:03, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 21 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - Easily passes WP:GNG. As stated in the first AfD and contrary to the nom's stipulation, Time published an extensive article of how this and other cases will have long term effects on US pilot training, screening monitoring laws and procedures. --Oakshade (talk) 01:45, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  00:43, 27 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep based on the previous AfD and the points made by Oakshade. Lukeno94 (talk) 11:04, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable enough. - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 14:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:GNG & WP:NTEMP. Also as it was covered by Time as stated above by User:Oakshade I think it also meets WP:INDEPTH not 100% sure on that one though. -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 19:56, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. NickSt (talk) 23:58, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.