Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jet card


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:41, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Jet card

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of any notability. Refs are own web-site or advertising blurb for use of corporate jets. Nothing showing any notability here - reads like a corporate advertisment. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 12:36, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete A thinly veiled ad, and though the concept might at some stage be notable, it certainly isn't now. Triptothecottage (talk) 13:42, 22 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep This concept is the private aviation equivalent to the public transport smart card. You either top-up or purchase hours in advance and every time you use the service - hiring a private jet - cash/hours are deducted from that card. It is not owned by any one company so I'm not sure what "own website" refers to. Features in Fortune, a three-part series from Forbes and Business Jet Traveller are sufficient for it to pass WP:GNG. Fuebaey (talk) 15:39, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   18:22, 22 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Merge with Fractional ownership of aircraft of which this appears to be a variant.Nigel Ish (talk) 18:41, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:48, 22 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep According to Forbes it is a multi-billion dollar market.Chulabula (talk) 02:04, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable references have been added to this article. Jet Card flights fall under FAA Part 135 regulations, unlike Fractional Ownership of Aircraft schemes which are classified as Part 91 operations according to the FAA. Very big difference there. Brbkolb (talk) 19:26, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep As admittedly slightly spammy in tone, but that's not a criterion for deletion and can be easily addressed; the subject appears to be notable, and likley to become even more so. &mdash;  O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  17:12, 29 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.