Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jetfire


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 19:02, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Jetfire

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Did a WP:Before, searched the news outlets and only found passing mentions to his toy and no significant coverage of him,, whenever mainstream outlets talk about him, it is always in a part of a greater media context and it is only a passing mention. So he does not meet GNG. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:37, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:13, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Toys.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Procedural Keep due to questionable motives of nominator and flood of similar nominations leaving no time for anyone to do non-Google research. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 19:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep: It's a shame there is so much cruft in the existing article, but looking into this briefly, the whole Jetfire / Skyfire naming and the licensing conflicts between franchises and manufacturers make this guy's real-world story pretty interesting. Some works that cover it: Den of Geek did probably the best job here, Gizmodo touched on it with a re-release, this book has seen some criticism for basic coverage on some characters (only stats), but the entry here provides the good real-world info. A few more: Anime News Network coverage and a cartoon to film breakdown from ...yes... the dreaded Comic Book Resources (for what it's worth, this one is not a listicle piece, and actually reads with some decent insight). There have to be some comic reviews to pull from, but there's clearly enough already that WP:NEXISTS to maintain this one.  The article should definitely be trimmed down outside AfD, though. -2pou (talk) 18:20, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * CBR is a strange site, in that they run a lot of social media listicle fodder but do have both good analysis, interviews and the like if you poke around. The dismissal of it as a source outright in some AfDs has been somewhat unsettling, as most news websites run plenty of frivolous stuff to stay afloat. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 21:23, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per arguments presented by 2pou. BOZ (talk) 18:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I appreciate the discussion must still run its course but it is worth noting that the nominator has been blocked for persistent bad faith actions. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 19:09, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, as yes I agree that the Jetfire/Skyfire naming and the licensing conflicts make him a very interesting character indeed. Davidgoodheart (talk) 02:58, 1 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.