Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jetman (facebook)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Core desat 06:22, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Jetman (facebook)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No notability established, no notability likely to ever be established. Quite possibly spam. Stlemur (talk) 06:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Google search of "jetman facebook" only turned up a few forums and videos. Could not find anything in the way of reputable third-party sources. Probably spam. -FrankTobia (talk) 06:49, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - It's written like an advertisement, it's almost blatant enough to be speedy tagged. Applications are essentially extensions of the master program.  If individual Firefox extensions do not have their own articles, then this article should be delete as per WP:N.   - Jameson L. Tai   talk  ♦  contribs   09:28, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable, should be included into the main Facebook page if at all. Poeloq (talk) 10:07, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Nope, not merge...this application was not developed by Facebook. It is illogical to group third party developments into the original product's article.   - Jameson L. Tai   talk  ♦  contribs   10:10, 10 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete I couldn't find any articles published by reliable sources relating to the game, which makes it non-notable and non-verifiable. I might also point out that Wikipedia is not a guide. -- jonny - m  t  04:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Do Not Delete -Should not be deleted, it is legitimate, only doesn't appear on searches as it is owned and protected by copyright against being shared by other third-party online gaming sites. 70.101.109.95 (talk) 02:47, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable, not mentioned on Facebook that importantly. Agreed, if other apps. don't have their own articles, why does this one have one? Fishdert (talk) 20:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.