Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewel Kelly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 09:44, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Jewel Kelly

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unelected congressional candidate fails WP:NPOL. KidAd •  SPEAK  22:58, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:14, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:14, 23 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, does not pass WP:NPOL. The only mentions I can find are where his name is listed with the other 4 people running for the nomination. Probably WP:TOOSOON at best. LizardJr8 (talk) 01:51, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete agree. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:56, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the 2022 United States Senate election in Missouri, since this page was previously a redirect before being created. Muhibm0307 (talk) 13:18, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete If he wins the general election he will be notable. Not before that. Since the primary is over a year away, we do not even know he will be on the ballot when it happens. It is far too soon for even a redirect.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:56, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:NPOL, but can be recreated if they win the general election.  Onel 5969  TT me 03:36, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete As per nom fails GNG, can't see reliable coverage. Zackdasnicker (talk) 04:50, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Coverage is weak and not pass general notability guidelines. TheDreamBoat (talk) 05:50, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in future political party primaries, but this is not demonstrating or reliably sourcing that he has preexisting notability for other reasons independently of an as yet non-winning candidacy. No prejudice against recreation in November 2022 if he wins the senate seat, but nothing here already gets him an article today. No objection to the recreation of a redirect to the election article if desired, but this should be deleted first so that there isn't a revertable article in the edit history to editwar over. Bearcat (talk) 19:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.