Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewelled antler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus to delete, so kept by default. Johnleemk | Talk 13:00, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Jewelled antler
interesting but not notable as per WP:NMG --WAvegetarian 21:46, 22 November 2005 UTC) (--WAvegetarian 04:06, 27 November 2005 (UTC)


 * as per criteria #4 & #5:


 * jewelled antler artist have releases on larger indie labels such as FAT CAT & Jagjaguwar/Secretly Canadian


 * jewelled antler artists have been written about extensively in the WIRE magazine (for example: feature article issue 219 May 2002)

as well as appearing in Vice Magazine, the Village Voice & countless others...
 * --the author


 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. &mdash;Crypticbot (operator) 15:49, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep This is one of my rare keep votes for an music-related afd. This "collective" or whatever you call it is mentioned in popular music media such as Pitchfork Media.   Jasmol 16:56, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Abstain The fact that an atist who used to produce under a "banner" "moved on to more high profile releases" does not make the lower profile bannerthey used to produce under notable. Nor does said artists getting written up for other work in major publications. Mere mention in popular music media isn't enough either; it must be "prominently featured." The movement/collective was talked about quite a bit in the review of The Blithe Sons: Arm of the Starfish on Pitchfork. While establishing the presence of the Jewelled Antler collective, it does not feature it as the review is about an album by another group, albeitt comprised of Jewelled Antler members, and released under another label. That said, rereading the article, I find that it is neither "a musician or ensemble" as its changing membership and loose organization make it more of a genre than a band. I can't say that I feel it is notable, but WP:NMG simply doesn't apply to it. I withdraw my nomination. --WAvegetarian 04:06, 27 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.