Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewish-Israeli Dissent Leipzig


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:48, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Jewish-Israeli Dissent Leipzig

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This page describes a non-profit organization, so sources should satisfy WP:SIRS to prove notability. The current four sources fail. As interviews with the founder, the Jewish Currents and +972 sources fail requirements #1 and #4 that they be independent and secondary. I am unfamiliar with jetzt.de and cannot judge whether it is RS. However, that does not matter for this deletion discussion because the Google Translate translation does not seem to mention this organization. It only discusses the founder, who perhaps could be the subject of an article himself if sufficient RS coverage exists. Finally, the Jüdische Stimme source seems to be a petition or statement, rather than secondary coverage.

External links are primary, interviews, and an event notice, and so do not satisfy SIRS. Beyond SIRS, these sources seem to fail the more general N/BASIC/GNG.

A search for RS per BEFORE failed. The suggested searches turn up largely articles written by Sappir, not RS coverage of this article subject. I searched for both "Jewish-Israeli Dissent Leipzig" and the founder's name. Similarly, searching the Wikipedia Library turned up only two articles, neither of which had to do with the article subject. Checking "what links here" identified no new sources. Freelance-frank (talk) 02:42, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Israel, Palestine, Germany, Judaism,  and Organizations. 02:47,  8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - agree with the nominator's comments. Interviews are not good indicators of notability. The article in Jetzt.de seems reasonable if reliable, but does not seem to be really in-depth coverage of the organization. My own searches turned up nothing else meaningful not mentioned above, but it's possible I missed some German-language sources. There may be a reasonable case to be made for Sappir being personally notable, but notability is not inherited and the organization does not appear to be. —Ganesha811 (talk) 23:59, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, small insignificant organisation without in depth coverage. ---Lilach5 (לילך5) discuss 19:40, 14 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.