Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewish Diplomatic Corps


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to World Jewish Congress. Star  Mississippi  17:52, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Jewish Diplomatic Corps

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non notable organisation; the sources only estabilsh that WP:ITEXISTS. Amisom (talk) 10:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:49, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Judaism. Shellwood (talk) 10:35, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge to World Jewish Congress I agree with Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan. The sources cited are not sufficient for WP:GNG. In order to keep this articles, I think more independent reliable sources are needed. PaulPachad (talk) 10:11, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:10, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Could not find any reliable sources or news articles establishing any notable information on the actions of this group. ArdynOfTheAncients (talk) 16:49, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge to World Jewish Congress I have evaluated the references. The first reference covers the organization rejoining the World Jewish Congress. The second source is an interview with a member of the organization, but does not cover anything about it. I conducted a Google search and saw some articles (including one not independent of the subject), social media accounts, and insignificant mentions of the group. However, I found these:, , . Let me know what you think about these sites' abilities to establish the article's notability. --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 20:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - Even nom acknowledges that sources exist. Some are reliable and independent, while others lack depth; this is probably due it being something of an ad-hoc advocacy offshoot of WJC. In addition to what LPS found, I found this, which mentions campus activity, and this trivial mention. WP:SPINOUTs of offshoot organisations are definitely permitted, especially since the World Jewish Congress, at almost 15k words and 200kb, is simply WP:TOOBIG to add on an additional topic like this one, which can be expanded a little further. And while I said "weak" (because we should be mindful of WP:ORGCRIT) I think there is just enough to go on. Havradim  leaf a message  08:24, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
 * My 'acknowledgingt hat sources exist' is nothing to do with the question of notability. See WP:EDPN. Amisom (talk) 15:51, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. No WP:GNG problem and, as an independent organization and from a long article, the WP:SPINOUT is justified. gidonb (talk) 17:19, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge to World Jewish Congress as WP:ATD. This is an organization therefore NCORP guidelines apply. As per WP:SIRS *each* reference must meet the criteria for establishing notability - the quantity of coverage is irrelevant so long as we find a minimum of two. WP:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. This is usually the criteria where most references fail. References cannot rely only on information provided by the company, quotations, press releases, announcements, interviews fail ORGIND. Whatever is left over must also meet CORPDEPTH.
 * None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability of the company. Topic therefore fails WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 13:01, 4 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.