Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewish Motorcyclists Alliance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep - Yet another bad faith sockpuppet nomination. FCYTravis (talk) 04:56, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Jewish Motorcyclists Alliance

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

595 ghits does not make this organization notable Moosato Cowabata (talk) 10:02, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep' per WP:ORG and WP:GHITS. A Google News search indicates that JMA has enough high quality Google hits from WP:RS to satisfy WP:ORG. A simple number of ghits is not a valid test of WP:Notability. • Gene93k (talk) 10:22, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to the article to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 11:07, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You may not realize it, but this is actually an improvement argument, not deletion argument. Per WP:DEL, if it can be fixed by methods other than deletion (such as editing), it's not a good deletion candidate.  Celarnor Talk to me  12:38, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep. Several sources are available for the subject.   Also, nominator's rationale is inherently flawed.  See WP:NOTBIGENOUGH. Celarnor Talk to me  12:38, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * KEEP For same reason as above. Ijanderson977 (talk) 13:03, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep For the same reasons as Celarnor mentions. lnemtsov (talk) 17:46, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:43, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources found by Celarnor. There's no "If sources aren't yet placed in the article, then those sources don't exist and the article must be deleted" clause of WP:NOTABILITY.  --Oakshade (talk) 22:43, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep if citations are added - There are sources, but now someone needs to take the time to put them in. Assuming someone will do that, it's a keep. But if nobody bothers to source the article between now and close, this should be deleted. FCYTravis (talk) 01:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Sources simply not placed in the article yet doesn't mean the topic is non-notable, it just means the article on this notable topic should be improved.--Oakshade (talk) 04:05, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.