Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JewsDidWTC.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Sometimes WP:SNOW is red. We already deleted this and reviewed it, if this is not an end-run around process then it's a re-creation out of process of material deleted by consensus. The community has spoken, and with pretty much one voice it has said "no". Guy (Help!) 20:01, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

JewsDidWTC.com

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Neutral I'm not sure if this would qualify to be speedy deleted or not, so I'm going to give the benefit of the doubt and bring it up for discussion here. --Адам12901 Talk 06:40, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep The creator of the AFD hasn't even provided a reason for deletion, and notability has been established. --HideandLeek 06:48, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment HideandLeek is the creator of this article, and — HideandLeek (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. (56 edits) SkierRMH 07:03, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Yes, I am. How is this relevant? --HideandLeek 07:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Read WP:COI. JuJube 20:45, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per CSD G1, A1 and A7 (WP:WEB). Orderinchaos78 06:58, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy a single apperance on CNN, along with other websites, is not notability. For that matter, we should give an article to that video of a cat in the pet washer -- febtalk 07:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * You mean there isn't one already?! Man, I got some work to do! --Адам12901 Talk 07:11, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete, repost of speedy deleted article JewsDidWTC, whose deletion review request was withdrawn. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 07:08, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Someone puts up a parody/trolling site on the web.  Then CNN does a report on 9/11 conspiracy theories, but the reporters don't do their homework and they end up referencing a site run by the GNAA instead of a genuine anti-semitic group.  Does this make the trolling site notable?  Probably not.  Also, I'm not seeing any evidence that what's on Youtube is something that CNN actually aired, as opposed to something that someone else spliced together.  Dave6 07:14, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * CommentThis brings up an interesting point, the video on youtube is VERY choppy and poor quality -- febtalk 07:16, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete The article is anti-semetic and related to the GNAA. --HideandLeek 07:26, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment' First of all, those aren't reasons to remove an article. Secondly, you've already voiced your opinion above. Thirdly, why are you voting against your own decision? WP:POINT? -- febtalk 07:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep (-ish) per HdeandLeek (reason in first vote not second! Crazy that I should have to say that...). Though I shall say I do wonder about HideandLeek's motives here.... Hmmm... Mathmo Talk 10:55, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete trivial website --Steve (Slf67)talk 11:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet WP:WEB Alex Bakharev 12:20, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete a few sentences about a blink-and-you'll-miss-it website, mentioned on one news channel once. says nothing about why the site is notable. Totnesmartin 14:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete one mention on CNN satisfy the does not multiple coverage requirement of WP:WEB.-- danntm T C 14:50, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, notability not established. Argyriou (talk) 15:33, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete in the strongest possible terms. The appearance on CNN is not sufficient to establish notability or credibility. There are so many conspiracy theory websites about 9/11, such as Reopen911.com and Whatreallyhappened.com, and you can see from the redlinks that they don't have articles.  Also, it's POV in a blatantly disgusting way. YechielMan 16:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * http:// www. jewsdidwtc. com/ and http:// jewsdidwtc. com/ (which are both on Wikipedia's spam blacklist) both exist and have identical contents. Delete. Anthony Appleyard 18:16, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per the recent endorsements of deletion of Gay Nigger Association of America and Jewsdidwtc, both discussing the CNN story and rejecting it as a basis for reposting the article(s). NawlinWiki 19:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per YechielMan. JuJube 20:45, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Trolling site with no real evidence of notability given, and was just recently up on WP:DRV. WarpstarRider 22:30, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Where's the notability? SUBWAYguy 05:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as repost Very recent DRV request of equivalent article was withdrawn Bwithh 00:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No reliable sources to assert notability. --- RockMFR 23:07, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.