Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jews for Animal Rights


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirect to Roberta Kalechofsky. El_C 08:17, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Jews for Animal Rights
It is cabal-cruft. This is pure Fancruft. There is allegedly a cabal on Wikipedia that is pro Jewish, pro animal rights and this is just a Fancrufty article based off such fan interests. Thus, it makes it cabal-cruft. The article also is purely non-notable. The book sources don't reference the organization and some even were published before it began -- they are also non-notable sources, too, and most look self-published, which fails wikipedia's notability guidelines. The website references failed WP:V and WP:N and WP:WEB (including failing google and alexa), making the article failing WP:V and WP:N. The organization also fails WP:ORG. DyslexicEditor 07:25, 6 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletions.   --  ''Em-jay-es  20:28, 9 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge. Hmmm ... if the page was created by a pro-Jewish, pro-animal rights cabal, I'm it, and I'm clearly somewhat off-message, because I think the page should be merged with Roberta Kalechofsky, its founder. SlimVirgin (talk) 08:36, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge. Seconded merge proposal. What he said. --293.xx.xxx.xx 09:22, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge. Given that the entire table of contents consists of "See also", "Notes", "References" and "Further reading", We're hardly going to overwhelm the Roberta Kalechofsky page by merging/redirecting. --DeLarge 10:17, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment There is only a cabal if you want there to be one --Roninbk t c e # 12:36, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge article, and avoid "cabal" allegations in future nominations. Jayjg (talk) 18:21, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per nom. ←Humus sapiens ну? 21:01, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 'Wait for sources on notability. This is not a garage band or other obviously non-notable organization and should be given time to provide independent evidence of notability. If no evidence is forthcoming, Merge per above. Agree that nominations should stick to policy criteria like non-notability and personal objections to an organization's POV etc. are not legitimate grounds for a deletion nomination and should not appear in them. --Shirahadasha 04:41, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Cabal orders. Oh wait, SV is the head of the cabal and says to merge. This cabal really needs to work on its communication abilities. Ok, joking aside merge but maybe give some time to see if anyone can locate other sources? JoshuaZ 04:39, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I have a meeting set up with myself tonight to discuss how better to communicate with myself in future. SlimVirgin (talk) 04:42, 12 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep or Merge. Anomo 04:56, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. "Merge" closures generally don't get carried out. Move the wanted data to Roberta Kalechofsky and delete/redirect. --Aaron 16:32, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. רח"ק | Talk | Contribs 07:57, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.